Sample report · same layout as a client report

Sample report: the client is invented, the tasks and numbers are from our public Aider test. Protocol and raw data.

Diet report: "Example agency", coding agent

1. Answer first

Switch the agent from Opus to Sonnet. On your 27 test tasks it solved the same 26 at 49% lower cost (US$0.30 → US$0.15 per solved task). It lost nothing.

Keep Haiku off this work. It is over 16× cheaper again, but it failed 4 tasks that Sonnet solves.

2. Cost and quality, same tasks

ConfigurationSolved90% rangeCost per solved taskSaving vs today
Today: Claude Opus 5.526/2785–99%US$0.297baseline
Claude Sonnet 5.526/2785–99%US$0.152−49%
Claude Haiku 5.522/2767–91%US$0.009−97%, with losses

At 1,000 tasks a month, the Sonnet switch saves US$145 a month with no loss on these tasks.

3. What you lose with each cheaper configuration

Sonnet: nothing that today's setup solves.

Haiku fails these, all of which today's setup solves:

Pattern: the main path works; edge cases and error handling break. If those matter to your clients, stay on Sonnet.

4. How we measured

5. Range and scope

6. Next steps

  1. Switch to Sonnet on 10% of traffic for a week and compare live results.
  2. Re-check in 3 months, or before any model you use retires (retirement calendar).

A client report has the same six parts, uses only your tasks, and stays private. Prices · How we handle your data